perplexed Posted by Douglas on May 04, 1999 at 16:59:39:
In Reply to: Re: Introduction; Post Script posted by Sally on May 03, 1999 at 23:58:09:
You have lost me here; I have no idea whatsoever what this reply is about. Maybe confusion is the point! While I am on the subject of
confusion, let me clear up my obscure reference to "inked stained footprint". I read your reply to John, re: ponderings, which leads me
to believe that the reference isn't a familiar one. It is the practice, at least here in Canada, that all newborn infants are identified by
their footprints and palm prints the way adults are identified by their fingerprints. I don't believe that the fingerprints on infants are
sufficiently developed. It was meant as a colourful allusion, nothing more.
Archived 15 Jun 99